patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Absence of Prayer at Council Meetings Sparks Debate in Galloway Township

Started under Mayor Tom Bassford and continued under Keith Hartman, invocations have been missing for a few months, and residents have noticed.

 

The issue of the separation of church and state has been part of American history since the country's inception, and now the centuries-old debate has taken on a local feel.

Galloway Township Council meetings have begun with an invocation from a representative of a local religious organization since Tom Bassford was mayor, but the practice has been absent from proceedings since the summer.

On Tuesday night, Nov. 13, the issue came to the forefront.

“I’m not that religious, but I come to the meetings and I like to hear the ministers,” resident Tom Mitchell said during the public comment portion of Tuesday night’s council meeting. “They’re part of the community, and I feel better when they’re here. I like to hear the different points of view. It helps me be a better person.”

Township Manager Arch Liston took responsibility for no longer allowing an invocation prior to meetings.

“In concept, it was a good idea, but the problem we were running into is that we were asking them to make it non-denominational, but the clergy went against our wishes and made it very denominational,” Liston said. “The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has made it clear there’s no place for prayer in meetings, and from a business standpoint, I don’t want the ACLU filing a lawsuit.”

The court doesn’t forbid the act of public prayer prior to council meetings, but recommends aggressively limiting the words in prayer, so as not to allow for a government endorsement of a religion. The ruling by the court of appeals on a case out of North Carolina in 2011 stood pat in January of this year, when the Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

Former mayor Keith Hartman was also concerned about the township being sued, but stated that during his time a resolution championed by himself and passed in 2011 put the township in a position to prevail against any lawsuit brought against it concerning an invocation.

“(Previously) we had the manager’s secretary calling the same seven or eight churches to come out and do invocations,” Hartman said Tuesday night. “We did some extensive research into case law and found we had to address the establishment cause.”

Hartman said the township’s policy was to invite every religious institution, regardless of belief, to give an invocation. If any religion was not represented by an institution in the township, Galloway would contact institutions at the county level in an effort to get a fair representation, Hartman said.

“If we invited faiths and they didn’t respond, it didn’t matter as long as we made the effort and we were not restrictive,” Hartman said.

He added the policy also allowed for residents to continue to exercise any religion they wished.

The policy was passed via resolution in 2011, and no resolution has been officially passed to overturn that policy.

In its place, the township holds a moment of silence prior to the beginning of each meeting.

“A moment of silence is the fairest form,” Liston said.

Typically, Mayor Don Purdy leads the moment of silence, asking residents to keep a particular person or group in their thoughts.

“We can always shift around to anyone who wants to lead,” Purdy said. “We can work with the way it’s structured.”

Purdy said he did like that local church officials were afforded the opportunity to go before the public at council meetings and speak about what's happening at their churches.

"They come in here for the love of their community," Purdy said.

Galloway Democratic Club President Kevin Krumaker said via email Tuesday night that he believes invocations "can be implemented to follow a few best practice guidelines," including: "No expen­di­ture of Township funds for reli­gious activ­ity; and no favoritism of one reli­gious denom­i­na­tion over another."

Purdy said it’s easier to maintain the separation, and that he enjoys the way it’s done right now.

“If we were starting from scratch, I would say a moment of silence is the best route to go, but when you already have a policy in place, why would you overturn it,” Hartman said. “You have a strong faith group in Galloway, and they want that invocation. Why would you stop, because you’re afraid of getting sued? Well you can get sued the other way, if you don’t have it.”

He added that he had been in discussions with the ACJF, which said it would defend the township against any lawsuit brought against it by the ACLU.

Township Solicitor Michael Fitzgerald acknowledged the risk factors of having an invocation prior to council meetings.

“The risk remains for a misstep and that leads to litigation,” Fitzgerald said. “Not only do we have to pay our own costs, but with fee shifting, there’s the possibility we’d have to pay the plaintiff’s costs. You can try to control what is said when someone comes in, but is it prudent to try to do so when you can just have a moment of silence?

“You can always be second guessed, and it can cost a lot of money.”

Councilman John Mooney called the controversy a case of judicial activisim.

“Social progressives are driving public policy and religious beliefs are sitting in the back of the bus,” Mooney said. “Until the courts retreat from being the second legislative branch they’ve become, I don’t see much hope there.”

“I would tell the people your vote is important because it’s important to elect officials who appoint judges that don’t misinterpret the constitution,” Councilman Brian Tyrrel said. “The open discussion is not allowed, but my faith and value guide my decisions.”

The man who was mayor when invocations were first introduced to the township would like to see them continue.

“I didn’t think much of it,” Bassford said of the absence of invocations. “There was no vote. It just happened. Once in a while we had some people deviate from what they were supposed to do, but nothing major. Congress starts each session with a prayer. They can do it and we can’t? There’s something wrong with this picture.”

"The U.S. Con­gress opens in prayer and Galloway Council can do the same," Krumaker said. "Keep in mind, the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives uses an on-staff chap­lain to administer the prayer. A non-denominational prayer can be read, and it is con­sti­tu­tional. A possible avenue for Galloway Council is to have a council member lead the invocation as was done in the past."

Council members led non-denominational prayers prior to Bassford's time as mayor.

Related Topics: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Freedom Of Speech, Galloway Township, freedom of religion, and invocations at city meetings

Michael Cluff

7:34 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Just what the Township needs: an expensive Constitutional battle. I'm glad there are some on the council who are wise enough to understand that if you want the wisdom of a spiritual advisor, go to church.

Reply

Keep Galloway Green

9:45 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I thought they got rid of Preachers so they could go full steam ahead with all their evil plans?.... Don't want any Preachers asking questions why Galloway won't fix anything at the Municipal Complex or why they want to sell the Complex to developers. The moment of silence is for the Post Office they refuse to save....& for the death of Character on Galloway Council. Galloway is worried about lawsuits?....Don't make me laugh...They love lawsuits...They collect hem!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Schreiber

11:59 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Yes by all means "Don't stand in the "Devil's way"

Dofang

10:06 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Nobody's being 'punished' if the council remains neutral on religious matters.

Reply

Harry Scheeler

10:37 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

This could actully cause more lawsuits. This only stops the invitation to the ministers but anyone can stand up during public comment and say a prayer. There is nothing the Township or Ms. Whitney Ullman can do about it. And if they tired to stop it they would be looking at an ACLU freedom of speech lawsuit. I'm actully shocked the Ms. Ullman is the cause of this. Ms. Ullman was elected by the people to serve them. Not change the Township to suit her religious beliefs. How are you serving the people Ms. Ullman by denying Christians the right to pray to Jesus?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Red

1:23 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Real Christians can pray to Jesus anytime they want -- in their hearts and minds -- it's only frauds like you who need to have a platform from which to run your brand of religion down the throats of everyone. Ullman is not denying anyone their right to pray.

Samantha Siang

10:55 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Here we go again. A moment of silence should satisfy most everybody.
Really, with all the darn issues facing Galloway Twp., this is unreal.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dofang

12:52 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Exactly. How does this non-controversy help fix school roofs or get the town's garbage collected?

Comment_arrow

Red

1:25 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Bingo! It's called a "distraction" -- while people are whining about a silly prayer, they won't notice the township is $3 million in debt, cutting the police dept and the public works dept, and that Council is clueless about how to get out of this mess created by blowhards like Bassford and misfits like Hartman.

Dofang

11:01 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

No Christian in Galloway is being denied the right to pray to Jesus. There is no 'right' to hijack a council meeting to promote a particular religious view. There are Christians, Jews, atheists, Unitarians, Hindus, and plenty others paying taxes in this town. For that reason the council must remain neutral.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Schreiber

1:49 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Dofang. check again you pay for garbage pick not the TWp..

Comment_arrow

Dofang

2:06 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Believe me I know I pay for garbage pickup! I'm hoping that will become a council topic again sometime soon... ;-)

Ron Schreiber

11:57 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Maybe "Arch Liston" could lay off the priest along with the rest of the "Employee's"

Reply

Ron Schreiber

11:58 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

"America" this is where it start's .."Main Street"

Reply

Bill

12:18 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

This Country is so Screwed up it isn't funny. No Flag salute in schools. You can't mention Christmas in schools either. "GOD" Forbid it might offend someone. Well that is America if you don't like it go the Hell back from where you came from.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dofang

1:19 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Don't know about you, but 'where I came from' is Virginia. Personally, I love my country deeply, and appreciate the fact that no teacher is allowed to pressure my kid to pray to their version of God.

(She is, however, pressured to include 'under God' within the pledge, which is indeed recited every day. I think you're mixing up your Fox News talking points.)

Comment_arrow

58yearGresident

9:39 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I think we need to look at where you are. If you haven't noticed, this is New Jersey with Chris Christie who is Qickly chasing the Good Teachers into retirement leaving the lesser experienced Teachers and dregs while Privatizing Public Schools to the Charter Schools and - Do charter Schools Have Prayers.

Dofang

12:28 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

"Had to stop it for EVERYONE"... you're forgetting that 'everyone' includes other religions and nonbelievers as well. I'm part of 'everyone' and agree with her entirely.

Why the focus on her Jewish beliefs?

Reply
Comment_arrow

VTPat

8:19 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Thank you Dofang! I concur!!

Keep Galloway Green

1:31 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Galloway invited every denomination so who did it offend? I just think Council doesn't want any religious types to nose around in their business. I would love to see another lawsuit...Galloway Township vs God... Arch runs day to day operations...but does he run Council Meetings as well? Why no vote?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dofang

1:36 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Are atheists a denomination? If one wanted to invoke the Flying Spaghetti Monster, would they have been welcome? Rastafarians? Buddhists? Why not keep it simple and just have a moment of silence, thereby allowing everyone to observe in their own way?

How is preventing an invocation keeping religious types from 'nosing around in their business.' Are they not allowed to attend council meetings like the rest of the public? Or do they have to be invited in like vampires?

pinkorange

1:52 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Dofang has it completely right. Pray in church. Take care of township business at a council meeting.

If you want things to be FAIR that means acknowledging that you share this township and country with other people who may hold different beliefs than you do. All of you complaining about Christians being discriminated against, do you really want wiccan prayers and muslim prayers at the start of your meeting? I would guess that the answer deep down in your heart is NO. You only want YOUR way, and you are acting like little children about it. A moment of silence lets everyone think about what they want to think about -- pray silently if you want or think about what to pick up for dinner, but stop acting like your particular group is the only one that matters.

Reply

JerseyDevil

1:53 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Council members led non-denominational prayers prior to Bassford's time as mayor.

This, the last sentence in the article, says it all. Go back to that, which is, in essence, what they've done with the moment of silence.

Reply

Ron Schreiber

1:53 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

What's next they take the American" Flag out of the council room ???

Reply
Comment_arrow

pinkorange

1:57 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

We are ALL Americans. Don't you remember that that this is a "melting pot" of many cultures and types of people? Or are you one of the people who forgot that the pilgrims came here to escape religious persecution? You have the right to practice whatever religion you want. That is what makes this country great!

Dofang

2:26 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Atheists too? Buddhists? Satanists? Agnostics? Jehovah's Witnesses? Scientologists? I know we have most, if not all of these in Galloway.

Reply

pinkorange

2:35 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Then maybe consider this, there is a time and a place for everything. Religion and government do not mix well. We do not live in a theocracy. If you want to practice what your religion teaches you, then do it by being a good example of a kind, compassionate, THOUGHTFUL individual. Think of others. Think of how you would feel if their particular faith was the law of the land and you were the odd man out. Then thank your god that you do not have to worry about being killed for your beliefs because you live in the USA. Live your life as an example of what you believe rather than needing to to proselytize to others.

Business meetings should be about taking care of business. Those who feel the need to pray for guidance, or help, or to win a football game can do it on their own time.

Matthew 6:5
"When you pray, don't be like the hypocrites who love to pray publicly on street corners and in the synagogues where everyone can see them. I tell you the truth, that is all the reward they will ever get."

Reply

Dofang

2:48 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Well, if so, she happened to 'connive' things in the right direction.

Props to PinkOrange for beating me to the quote from Matthew.

Reply

Dofang

2:57 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Be that as it may, if you step away from your focus on the personalities involved, the more important thing is the principle. And on the principle she was right.

Reply

Merle Kyle

4:02 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I have been fighting this battle since I moved here in 1984.Separation of church and state! I'm Jewish and proud of it! 1776 needs to be a little more circumspect in his or her comments!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Cluff

6:10 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Clearly, the drafters of the 1st Amendment forgot to add the clause saying "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...unless someone has a personal beef with a council member, then go for it."

IMO

4:42 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

There is absolutely no need for any religion in a township council meeting. If you want religion and prayer, got to your church, temple, etc... Council meetings are for offical government business.

Reply

Harry Scheeler

5:09 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Dofang the Satanists have been in Galloway for a long time lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Cluff

6:08 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Cool - if the Satanists are well represented in Galloway, I look forward to all the people supporting an opening prayer to welcome the Satanists when they get their turn with the council!

Merle Kyle

6:21 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

First of all, it's "wandering",not wondering. Second,I did not vote for Councilwoman Ullman as I do not base my vote on religious belief but on who will do the best job governing.Last, I consider you comments incendiary and most unkind but in America free speech is what it's all about and you can demonstrate that freedom by voting your preference.

Reply

Keep Galloway Green

6:27 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Separation of church & state is a joke....when you go to court...Do you swear the whole truth so help you God? Don't they swear people into to office with a bible? There is no separation of church & state. I still don't see the harm in having any Preacher who wanted to come to Galloway meetings come & say a pray for the misfits on Council. I don't think Purdy wants to share the spotlite...an attention hog!.....lol

Reply

Keep Galloway Green

6:32 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Why doesn't this Council save the Post Office?...They got $175,000 grant for a bike path...but they can't get a grant for the Post Office?....Yes they can get a grant if they try....they get grants for everything else. Can Gorman & Mc Elwee do it?....Time will tell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

58yearGresident

10:24 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Can you say Preferred Privatization.

Comment_arrow

58yearGresident

10:31 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

As nice of a thing it was for Galloway to loan Equipment and Operators to help with the Sandy Storm ( My Family gave Requested Food and Cash Donations ), It is just Financially Odd to be Paying Mannis Const/Demo. $10,000. per week + for Rental of Equipment and Operators Simultaneously while PINK SLIPS go out Tomorrow not next week. But thats just my Opinion!

VTPat

8:02 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Councilman John Mooney called the controversy a case of judicial activisim.
“Social progressives are driving public policy and religious beliefs are sitting in the back of the bus,” Mooney said. “Until the courts retreat from being the second legislative branch they’ve become, I don’t see much hope there.”

I have to ask is this guy serious?? Too much Fox News there Mooney. Don't forget the same conservative altar you worship at is the same one that calls your voracious public trough feeding, your fleecing of taxpayers, your wealth at the expense of taxpayers the result of a broken and corrupt system. You Mr. Mooney have been unelected for exactly that reason. If I were you I would shut-up and go home where the taxpayers of Galloway sent you. We don't need your Fox News Conservative dribble.

Reply

VTPat

8:16 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Go to a Council Meeting in AC and it's like a revival, a councilperson often leads the prayer! With that said i could care less about anyone's God or savior or any other supreme being fairy tale. What I do care about is the bad behavior of Mr Ullman and the obviously dumbfounded Mrs Ullman who doesn't have a clue about very much. Because of this goofiness this will be her "signature" issue. She will not be re-elected. I also am concerned about the anti-jewish sentiments I have read on here, didn't realize we had so many christian bigots in galloway, disappointing but not a surprise.

Reply

VTPat

8:23 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Any Fox News Conservative Christian Bigot Evangelical that voted for Mormon Romney who follows the prophet/angel "Moroni" has offended God and will be punished.LOL!!! Joseph Smith is laughing in his grave (on another planet).

Reply

Keep Galloway Green

9:56 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I'm wondering does Ullman or Liston have the power to pull the plug on the opening pray?....Seems like they should of had a vote on council about it. Ask the public what they thought. Just seems like King Purdy decided it was a good idea & that was it...No discussion...No vote. I always looked forward to some Preacher telling everyone when the next spagetti dinner was....lol

Reply

Dofang

10:54 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Was trying to decide between 'troll' or antisemite, but wow.

Reply

TheZog

2:56 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Another Bassford legacy. Everything that he has championed has gotten us into lawsuits or debt. He did nothing right and he has been poison for Galloway. Since he turned this town into a financial toxic waste site, the local garbage dump should be named in his dishonor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul john

9:58 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

what is this story i'm hearing of these self righteous past 2 mayors embroiled in extra-marital affairs - i guess it makes sense that they need the extra 2 minutes of prayer every 2 weeks at their place of work.

Harry Scheeler

8:26 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I wonder if he is still living in Pennsylvania. He promised to find a job around here but we never heard another word from the twp. Maybe he is hoping the voters will forget a out it.

Reply

58yearGresident

9:55 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

How about worrying about Friday or Monday when Galloway gives the Pink slips next week. Or about the Mass Gallowaywide Branches from the last 2 storms still on the ground. or about Leaf collection which just started with less employees. or like 9 Leaf Trucks and Leaf Vaccumes But what, 3 or 4 actual crews ( Not Secretaries Filling in for the terminated and or Laid Off Roads Division Employees who used to do this work for Low Pay and No Job Security. But why would we worry about those minor Thoughts when We the Taxpayers are instead paying Mannis Const/Demo. $10,000+ per Week for each Operator and small wheel Loader + to replace these lost employees as we read this. and much more!

Reply

58yearGresident

10:31 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

As nice of a thing it was for Galloway to loan Equipment and Operators to help with the Sandy Storm ( My Family gave Requested Food and Cash Donations ), It is just Financially Odd to be Paying Mannis Const/Demo. $10,000. per week + for Rental of Equipment and Operators Simultaneously while PINK SLIPS go out Tomorrow not next week. But thats just my Opinion!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keep Galloway Green

8:23 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Why are they paying Mannis Construction?.....Maybe after Nov 16 there will be a lot more anti Purdy/Council sentiment....lol

Anatheist

10:59 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Nobody should make Whitney Ullman out to be a bogeyman. the only possible purpose of religious invocation at a public function is an impermissible one- to ensure that the public function (i.e. government meeting) is sufficiently deferential to the higher power, and under that power's protection. Otherwise why would it be necessary? This is all cover for the "we are a christian nation" crapola. The problem with the religious windbags is that, like Galileo, they've only recently discovered that they aren't the center of the universe.

Reply

susan

11:21 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Isn't it one nation under god (no mention of jesus) - what's wrong with a moment of silence which should appease everyone - and i read that the prayer has only been around since Bassford was mayor so town council has prescedent for not having prayer. Unless Galloway wants to run all the jews, athiests and others out of town or have them uncomfortable in public forums a moment of silence is a wonderful idea. i can not even believe some of the insensitivity here. what happened to our christian love

Reply
Comment_arrow

Esty

12:44 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Susan: well said. Pubic forums such as government are to be for all, not just Christians. That is exactly why a separation of church and state was stressed by our founding fathers... and I know they weren't correct on everything (some had slaves), but on this point they were completely correct! (Though, I'm not sure if you knew Susan, but "under God" was just added to the pledge in 1954... it was never in the original pledge).

People who ask why people are offended need to realize it's not all about what offends, for me it's about what's right; and government cannot endorse any religion over any other. That is the law and that is what's right. Doing what's right is not always the easy choice, but what we should always strive for.

susan

1:50 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

"Despicable", like all jews according to your previous rants - you definitely don't define how i practice our religion! Take off your white hood and read the news article above - i know you do not like when a jew like Whitney or her husband express their views but they aren't the story - Obviously, the moment of silence was started after a concensus of the entire council felt they had a failed policy.

In concept, it was a good idea, but the problem we were running into is that we were asking them to make it non-denominational, but the clergy went against our wishes and made it very denominational,” Liston said.

Reply

TheZog

2:03 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Unfortunately, I believe that Ulhman will be remebered only for this controversy and especially the classless husband's actions as a spectatator of a Council meeting.

Reply

lovethyneighbor

4:01 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

so the husband stuck up for the wife after the 'old lady' berated his wife! boo hoo! his kind should tolerate the disrespect of his wife who probabally makes a dollar an hour working for the township while everyone else is entitled to their opinion! send me the address to your next kkk rally!

Reply

Leslie

3:29 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

With all the scandals, lies, law suits, layoffs going on in our township, perhaps starting a meeting with a moment of prayer to God who is no respecter of persons would he a wise thing, an opportunity to heal our township and provide some wisdom to those who apparently need it. On another note, I would like to remind Christians, Jesus is the greatest Jew that ever lived, king of the Jews according to the bible..So stop the antisemitism remarks. Peace.

Reply

smithvillian

11:35 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Actually 1776....most of what your stating isn't "factual". Now THAT is a fact.

Reply

Esty

12:40 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

1776: You sound like you believe what you're saying and that is worrisome to me, to say the least. Let me see if you can look at what you're saying from another point of view. Antisemitism is a subset of racism; racism just directed at the Jewish people. Racism is using stereotypes in a generalized way to say all people of a certain group (Jews in this case) behave a certain way based on my preconceived notions of the general way I believe most of 'those people' behave. Whether or not your preconceived notions are correct or not (they're not by the way... but that's besides the point) it is absolutely incorrect to say every Jew acts conniving (or whatever behavior you want to say) just because you believe that is generally how Jews behave. Remember, generally means for the most part, not all. To use stereotypes in such a fashion, to paint every Jew one way based on your preconceived notions of Jews in general, is the very definition of antisemitism. So if you weren't aware of it, you now are. Now, you could be an antisemitic person and still be correct about your point of view on prayers at government functions, but you are not. A moment of silence or nothing at all are the only two possible solutions I see that are consistent with the law of our land, the constitution.

Reply

Esty

12:41 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Your name 1776 would seem to imply you are somewhat patriotic, as that's the date of our country's founding. If this is true please be aware that when the constitution was drafted many religious groups attempted to have religion, their religion, put into the document and it was rejected every time. In fact, the only time religion is mentioned in the constitution, the only time, is to state that no religious test shall be required to hold public office. This is the law of the land and the only time religion is mentioned. If you are truly a patriot (and why not, this is a great country) please see the incredibly well thought out way our founders drafted the law of our land: without religion being a part of government, in fact they went out of their way to ensure this.

Reply

Leslie

1:44 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

@1776..."comments like Jews always act the same way, and they don't part with their money"...those my friend are antisemintism and scream racist. Sometimes we open our mouths without thinking...aren't we fortunate to have a God who forgives...back to a moment in prayer..check your history, where did George Washington go during his inauguration, right into st Paul's church in nycity..to ask for Gods blessing, guidance, and wisdom., God made a covenant with israel and has not forgatton it, so be careful, judge not lest you be judged, take your anger and pray for those with whom you have issue. Peace.

Reply

Esty

3:14 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Leslie: Some good points there, some of our founding fathers were religious and did religious things, no doubt. And though there are many instances of religion being improperly mixed with government, Washington did it right. He was inaugurated at Federal Hall (then called Old City Hall) in NYC (then the US capitol). After the conclusion of the inauguration, he went with a procession to St. Paul's church. He went (here you are correct) to ask for God's blessing. Here we have a good example of how to properly keep church and state separate, but still be faithful to your religion. Washington had the inauguration in a state house and then after it was over, invoked his deity's blessing. There is never any problem with invoking your deity's blessing after or before the business of government is being done, just not during. And yes, there have been instances where this didn't happen in history, that's true, but those are instances where the constitution's explicit instructions were not adhered to.

Reply

Leslie

3:23 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Thanks Esty.
.I was not at the meeting, I saw this post and jumped right in..again..a moment of prayer with no respecter of persons certainly cant hurt this town let alone the country which is a mess right now... peace ~

Reply
Comment_arrow

Esty

3:46 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Leslie:
Thanks for turning the conversation back to the proper subject, sorry that I get quite gabby. I would (respectfully) disagree that prayer in the beginning of the meeting would be OK. Will it hurt anyone...not in any real sense I think, but government is not supposed to push one set of beliefs over any other. That is why a moment of silence is the most that should happen. You seem like a very reasonable person, so let me ask you (and everyone else) something: one of the largest growing religious affiliation is "not religious", another fast growing group is Muslims. What if in the future one of those groups is the majority, would a prayer to Allah or an invocation that goes something like, "let's all remember to not let superstitious beliefs dictate our actions, but let reason and logic reign"? That would be just as terrible, though again, it wouldn't really hurt anyone, right? But it would be forcing some belief system (or lack of one) on everyone else. The best way to ensure this doesn't ever happen is to do the right thing: not let government endorse any belief system. A moment of silence to privately do whatever you want is the best compromise and endorses no religion. That, or nothing at all.

Leslie

6:41 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I hear you Esty, i guess I would have to say ..lets pray about it :) , but if its ok for the United States Congress it should be ok for Galloway twp. My thoughts of course come from a place of deep faith and respect to others for their faith. Perhaps those who truly seek God for wisdom concerning affairs in the community can start a prayer meeting before or after the meeting....A moment of silence is certainly a start.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dofang

9:08 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Well put, Leslie. Though I'm an atheist, I've always felt that separation of church and state was helpful to religion as well. After all, the best way to turn people away from religion is to do what Europe did and mix them together. (The Baptists were thrilled at the concept when the Constitution was formed, since they feared the Episcopalians would use their power to make Episcopalianism the state religion.)

Keep Galloway Green

10:18 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I would love to see all the Preachers...Rabbis...& everyone else who wants to say an opening pray for Galloway be invited back. Include everyone... Makes those dull meetings more bearable.

Reply

Leslie

7:02 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I thought I was done posting here until my eye just caught the headline in the current.."God doesn't have a prayer in Galloway" front page. I was saddened as I read...for many what I am going to say might sound like foolishness to you..but for those who have ears to hear..listen closely...The old testament ..adhered to by Jews and Christian alike..2Chronicleschapter 7 verse 14 reads..........IF my people who are called by my name will HUMBLE themselves and PRAY and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, forgive their sin and HEAL their LAND".........America is that land and so is Galloway. Something to ponder....one more thing..this is not about religion..it's about Gods love.. Religion has no part in government..God is not about religion..there in lies the key. Peace..

Reply

58yearGresident

12:44 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Why are there like 96 blogs about Prayer, but less than 25 max for $ 50,000.00 to million $ Taxpayer $ Waste????????? Priorities Needed!!!!!!!!

Reply

Kevin Dermanoski

1:39 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Why is it allowed for the US House of Resentatives, and the US Senate in our Nations CapitaL allow themselves for moments of Prayer befor their regular gatherings daily? Our US Congress may have Prayer, but not Galloway Council?
Dictator Arch Liston, Please respond.
Kevin Dermanoski
361 S Leopzig Ave
Germania, Galloway Township
Egg Harnor City, NJ 08215

Reply
Comment_arrow

Red

1:53 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Because the Congress has a staff chaplain who recites a non--denominational prayer and doesn't rely on just anyone who claims he's a clergyman to show up and say a prayer.

Patrick Stoll

9:27 pm on Monday, November 26, 2012

Thomas Jefferson in 1802 ask for the separation of church and state and the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state, An seeing Pray is part of organized religion does this not fall under the separation of church and state YES very much. See all these board-member ask was for non-denominational pray not a full on church service and they keep getting the opposites of what they ask for. And lastly to all you folks who think your religion rights are being taking away NO THERE NOT, it's not as if there saying no church's with-in 15 feet of the townships business offices because of the separation of church. Simply put the township ask for non- denominational pray and they did not get it and now there just stating no more pray at there board-meeting. peace an luv

Reply

Barry Ross

10:23 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

Never compromise the name of Jesus from your prayers. If you do, it becomes nothing but an empty religious ritual at best, at worst, an abandoning of the faith.

Reply

Leave a comment